Why can't parents take pictures of their kids in the bathroom anymore? - pictures of matures in knickers
At the new Wal-Mart has continued to have children of a couple of pictures, as they have a bath with their children.
I thought everyone did this (take photos of their children, usually bathroom)? What's wrong with that?
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Pictures Of Matures In Knickers Why Can't Parents Take Pictures Of Their Kids In The Bathroom Anymore?
11 comments:
It is not paranoia, child pornography () is a heinous crime, which many innocent parents pay the price. A few months ago called a local photo developing curfew for photos on the left side. The images consisted of a toddler (almost 2) in the bathtub. These pictures are a few pictures of breastfeeding innocent children (the employee) was considered too old has led to allegations of abuse. WTF?
Finally, the mother was acquitted, but not before the involvement of the CPS, who was arrested and prosecuted, and lost his license for daycare.
How can we trace the parents for snapshots, but we consider posting an explicit photo sexual perverts children online and free? You tell me.
It is just more political correctness run amok. There is nothing wrong, but it is better to use a digital camera so as not in those days. This is not the first time with Walmart. It is understandable that no part of the industry of pornography with children want, but call someone who is paid minimum wage with few benefits simply has no meaning. Ernst industry of child pornography is very demanding. We truly believe that the movie will be developed at Walmart?
Parents believe that children think in that in the following years? They are very worried for her. The privacy of children must always be respected. In fact, I see no difference between taking a picture of a naked child and take a photo of a naked girl, except that babies are too stupid to know what happens.
This is ridiculous ... I have tons of photos from swim to my children, not only, but running around the house in its line of contact and on the beach, etc., etc. ... It is a sad sad state of affairs that we be careful to take pictures of their children when they are in their natural state and fortunate, because someone might have the wrong idea .... This is what our chaotic world has perverted: (
coz now rare. I think some places still able to print photos imean theyre too graphic (like you have to offer perverse as a baby in the bathroom as a graphic!)
I have pictures of my baby in the bath, however, meant that they couldnt be seen Willy for a bull when he was just weeks old hand for him, as I had to kiss her.
These people really have their children removed from home for three days, while DFS investigation. If you secure a "Bad" to ensure that no images of genitalia based sample - thats what the kidnapping of children - one photo shows a little too much.
I do not think that people have a problem with him (unless they are in a sexual nature, and children are very young). Some people are very stiff, what they consider unjust, but the offensive picture is bath time.
I personally see nothing wrong with it. I have many photos of my daughter's bathroom.
Huh? What Wal-Mart has to do with it?
thats f * cking stupid
My mother has pictures of babies min in the bath with my cousin
First - Wal-Mart can not be prosecuted if social services the children taken away by someone.
Well .. Who can be sued, b ut this does not mean that the parents will win ... Wal-Mart does not know whether the children of adults, or whether it is child pornography.
Better safe than sorry.
What's the big deal anyway, why the obsession with the genitals of children?
Post a Comment